The idea of "global best practices" promises a universal, one-size-fits-all solution for every business challenge. It's the alluring fantasy that you can simply borrow a successful strategy from a tech giant in Silicon Valley and expect it to work for a startup in Mumbai or a manufacturing plant in São Paulo. For those navigating the complexities of emerging markets, this approach often feels more like a myth.
Global best practices- Is it a myth or a blueprint?
These rigid sets of rules ignore local nuances, cultural context, and economic realities. They're sold as plug-and-play solutions, but the real world doesn't play by the same rules. An HR framework that thrives in a stable, resource-rich economy fails spectacularly in a place where infrastructure is shaky, talent is scarce, or cultural norms are completely different.
The myth of “global best practices” is that you bypass the work of understanding your own unique environment by simply borrowing a strategy from a different world. The blueprint mindset, on the other hand, is a framework, a set of foundational principles that can be adapted and molded to fit your specific context. It's a starting point to a goal.
While some universal principles hold true everywhere, like the need for clear communication and fair compensation, implementing them in emerging markets demands flexibility, not rigid templates. The answer is to use global knowledge wisely, to adapt universal principles to the unique realities on the ground.
The myth of universality
The myth of universality is a flawed concept. This belief is often sold by consultants who promise that a process from a Fortune 500 company can be directly applied to an emerging market team for guaranteed success. This ignores the crucial role of local context.
- The "one-size-fits-all" approach is a con: Consultants promote the idea of universal solutions, which often fail in reality. A data-driven performance metric may be useless in a place like Jakarta, where a team’s culture prioritizes loyalty and group harmony over individual KPIs.
- Context is the key to success: The fundamental flaw lies in ignoring local context. Each market has its own unique culture, values, and ways of working. A successful strategy must be adapted to these local realities rather than simply imposed from a global headquarters.
- The appeal of universality is psychological: The “global best practices” myth gains traction because it’s comforting. It offers a ready-made, seemingly proven solution, which is much easier to adopt than developing a tailored strategy from scratch. It provides a sense of certainty and control in a complex world.
- Local markets are not blank slates: Emerging markets are not passive recipients of global wisdom. They are dynamic, vibrant, and have their own established ways of doing business. Imposing a global standard without any local adaptation is not only irrelevant but disrespectful.
- Ignoring context leads to negative consequences: When HR leaders buy into this “global best practices”, they risk alienating their teams and damaging morale. By valuing a glossy framework over the real-world grit and unique needs of their local teams, they create a disconnect that can lead to a lack of engagement, decreased productivity, and high turnover.
The Blueprint: A framework for strategic adaptation
On the flip side, the blueprint model for HR uses global insights as a starting point for innovation. This approach requires a strategic, analytical mindset to adapt principles to local contexts.
- Core principles vs. methods: You can't have one without the other. Core principles provide the foundational "what"- the universal goals like fairness and clear communication. Meanwhile, methods provide the "how"- the specific, adaptable ways to achieve those goals in different situations. Both are essential: principles ensure consistency and flexibility needed to succeed in diverse contexts.
- Strategic problem-solving: Adopting this framework means asking difficult questions. Identify the core problem to solve and determine if the original solution will work locally.
- Engineer vs. mechanic: This approach elevates HR from simply following instructions (the "mechanic" role) to solving complex problems (the "engineer" role). It's a harder, but more rewarding, way of working that leads to better, more sustainable results.
When best practices actually work
Some global best practices do work because they address universal human needs. The key is to adapt these principles to fit local cultural contexts.
Universal principles and local adaptation
Core principles, such as clear communication, fair compensation, and investing in employee growth, are universally valued.A structured onboarding process, for example, can be beneficial in any market, but it must be tailored to local nuances.
- Feedback as an example: Employees globally want their voices heard, but the method of collecting feedback needs local adaptation. A 360-degree feedback system might be too direct for cultures where public criticism is considered disrespectful, even if public praise is highly valued. The universal principle is that people want respect; the local nuance is how that respect is defined and expressed.
- Cooking analogy: A leadership training program might globally emphasize individual achievement, but a successful adaptation in a community-oriented culture would pivot to focus on collective success and use local stories.
- Doing the homework: Effective adaptation requires deep understanding. This means talking to local teams, including on-the-ground employees, to understand what motivates them, what frustrates them. What’s the unspoken vibe in the office? A global practice like flexible work hours sounds great, but in some markets, it signals a lack of commitment unless you frame it right.The best HR leaders are translators, turning global ideas into local wins without losing the core value.
Avoid cultural landmines
You can easily make mistakes in emerging markets if you aren't paying attention to the cultural differences. These missteps can hurt a company's reputation and destroy employee trust.
- Individual vs. collectivist cultures: A global rewards program that publicly praises a top performer might backfire in a collectivist culture. It can embarrass the star employee and make their colleagues feel overlooked, potentially creating tension instead of fostering healthy competition.
- Hierarchy and communication: Pushing a Western-style "open-door policy" may not work everywhere. In some cultures, employees feel more comfortable and respected when following formal communication channels to raise concerns.
Ignoring these norms can make employees feel their concerns aren't being taken seriously. Learn the local norms before you deploy anything.
Build your own playbook
The process of building a successful playbook involves taking elements from global best practices and combining them with local insights. This creates a more effective and relevant strategy.
- Adaptation over adoption: Instead of rigidly adopting a global practice, you adapt it. For example, a structured onboarding process can be implemented, but with a focus on local relationship-building.
- Customization in practice: Rethink traditional methods to better fit the local environment. Swap formal annual performance reviews for more human-centered check-ins. Similarly, a hybrid work policy should be designed to accommodate local commuting challenges.
- Learning from experience: Learn from failures. A failed experiment in an emerging market can provide more valuable lessons than a flawless plan from a completely different context.
Wrapping it up
Don’t just swallow what the big consultancies feed you - poke holes, test assumptions, and talk to your people. Stay curious. Your teams know more about what works than any global framework ever will. Listen to them, not just the C-suite. And don’t be afraid to mix things up - blend global ideas with local hacks to create something that’s uniquely yours
The real blueprint is the willingness to question assumptions in the diversity of local emerging markets. Trust your own judgment. Create a culture of experimentation and learning, where failure is a data point. The best HR leaders don't just use shiny tools; they listen, learn, and build systems that resonate with their people.