Liquidity, not layoffs: A 60-day plan to save your people and your company

In tough times, most companies hit the "easy” button: layoffs. They treat their most valuable asset like surplus inventory. But what if there was a better way? A way that saves money, manages your workforce the same way a savvy CFO manages cash? Preserves vital knowledge, and builds fierce loyalty? That's the core of "Liquidity, Not Layoffs," a commitment to a 60-Day Internal Redeployment window for employees whose roles are at risk.

What does liquidity really mean? 

It's a promise to keep your talent and move them around internally instead of cutting them externally. It means treating talented employees as a valuable asset, like cash that you can quickly and strategically redeploy within the organization. 

• Liquidity: The ability to swiftly reallocate talent within the organization without losing the capability. It's moving skills, not firing people.
• 60-Day Window: Before any termination is final, the company spends 60 days actively trying to place the at-risk employee into a different, real role.
• No Fake Portals: Before anyone is shown the door, the company makes an aggressive, structured, and honest effort to find them a new home inside the walls. It demands real conversations, matching skills to genuine open positions, and providing a dignified exit only if no fit is found.

Why companies need to stop defaulting to layoffs

Most companies reach for the pink slip first because it’s easy and looks good on a quarterly report. But this 'easy button' strategy has massive hidden costs:

• The hidden financial cost: You pay severance now, then pay recruiters a higher rate to hire the exact same skills back in six months when the market shifts. You don't save money; you delay and significantly increase the expense.
• The institutional knowledge drain: When you cut someone, you lose everything they know about your systems, clients, and company quirks. That knowledge is priceless, and it walks out the door forever.
• The trust killer: A layoff sends a single, loud message to every remaining employee: "When things get rough, we throw you away." This destroys morale and trust, making your remaining team less productive and more likely to look for the exit themselves.
• The branding disaster: Nothing tanks a corporate brand faster than a former employee trashing their layoff experience on LinkedIn. Redeployment mitigates this social media fallout.

"Liquidity" is the opposite of the layoff mindset. Instead of thinning the herd, you dramatically increase the mobility of your people. The company becomes flexible without becoming unstable.

• The business sees talent as a fluid resource instead of fixed job boxes.
• Skills are redeployed internally before they are discarded externally.
• Every role is reexamined through the lens of business value, not just headcount.

The goal is to avoid unnecessary layoffs that happen only because the organization has no internal movement mechanism. Liquidity is financially intelligent because it saves money without harming people or capability.

The 60-day internal redeployment sprint: A structured approach

This program is a highly structured talent-matching operation, run like a focused project.

Phase 1: The talent liquidity audit 

• Gather real-time data: Collect updated skills, current workloads, and team priorities. What can people do today? Where are the skill surpluses? Where are the critical shortages?
• Map supply and demand: Find teams whose workload has dropped because of market shifts, and match them with teams that desperately need extra hands.
• The transparency rule: Start with a transparent list of every single open and soon-to-be-open role across the entire company. No hiding jobs, no exceptions.

Phase 2: The internal marketplace 

• HR becomes the matchmaker: HR’s aggressively put the profile (skills, experience, preferences) of every at-risk person in front of managers who are currently hiring.
• Create the marketplace: Build a transparent internal marketplace of roles, missions, and short-term projects. This should be an opportunity, not a punishment.

Phase 3: Skill matching and transitions 

• The 48-hour commitment: Hiring managers have 48 hours to review the candidate’s profile.
• Match micro-Skills: Focus on adjacent skills and project readiness, not just job titles. Move people into roles where ramp-up time is reasonable.
• Define a transition plan: For every transition, create a plan with weekly check-ins, clear mentorship, and documented deliverables. HR should be  the stabilizer; line managers become enablers.

Phase 4: Anchor redeployment 

• Review outcomes: Measure which teams gained capacity, which employees landed in better roles, and what savings were unlocked.
• Anchor the rhythm: Anchor redeployment into the operating model. It becomes a quarterly rhythm, not just a crisis response. This makes the company structurally liquid.

Why is it a win for everyone?

This process is about grown-up talent management. Layoffs should take place when you run out of imagination whereas Internal redeployment means you still have some fight left to build a better, stronger company.

• Breathing room and dignity. Employees get 60 days to find a new role without the panic of unemployment, seeing the company fight for them. This builds loyalty, even if they ultimately have to leave.
• Preserves top talent and reputation. The company keeps capable people who already understand the business. It signals to the external market that you are a place that values capability over fear.
• A dignified exit: Only if a genuine, aggressive effort results in no match after the 60 days, the employee leaves, but they leave with dignity and a proper separation package, knowing the company truly tried to keep them.

‍

Who owns this change?

Internal redeployment only works if accountability is clear and shared across the organization:

• The C-suite: Must set the non-negotiable rule: No external layoffs until internal redeployment options are completely exhausted.
• HR: Must run the process like a trading floor- fast, transparent, and fair, with no room for favoritism or politics.
• Managers: Must be forced to show their cards and express their true needs now, not in a fantasy roadmap. They must be rewarded for mobility, not for hoarding talent.

Conclusion: 

Liquidity is a test of corporate courage and financial intelligence. Defaulting to layoffs is  easy, temporary, and only creates a bigger mess later. By choosing the 60-Day Redeployment Sprint, leaders trade the short-term convenience of the pink slip for the lasting competitive advantage of a loyal, flexible workforce.

If your company opts for the layoff, it signals to the world and to its remaining employees that when the pressure is on, you run out of imagination before you run out of cash.

‍