Radical flexibility is the organisational commitment to let employees work when, where, and how they want, with minimal constraints or oversight. It's the idea that as long as work gets done, it doesn't matter whether the employee logs in at 6 AM or 10 PM, works from home or from a beach, or structures their day around personal commitments.
This policy became especially prominent during the pandemic, when remote work became the norm. Employees got used to designing their workdays around their personal schedule, and not the other way around. But now that the emergency has passed, HR teams are discovering that radical flexibility works well in theory but doesn’t hold up under a normal office structure. That’s because radical flexibility can create coordination chaos and put pressure on managers who can't lead a team they rarely see or hear from.
What are the signs that radical flexibility isn't working?
Radical flexibility fails when the ‘work freedom’ creates more problems than a structured working style.
- Lack of coordination: Radical flexibility means that one team member works in the morning, another works in the evening, and a third works sporadically throughout the day. So, scheduling a team meeting becomes a hassle as all three members are seldom available at the same time.
- Invisible work: Without shared working hours or regular check-ins, managers are often unaware of what their team is doing in a given moment. This can lead to laxity in work, project delays, and performance issues that are not detected early.
- Onboarding struggles: Radical flexibility works for employees who already know the organisational processes. But it's not ideal for the new hires to bed in and understand the ropes when they are just starting. Because of this, new candidates often struggle during onboarding.
How can HR implement flexibility without losing coordination?
Radical flexibility doesn't mean eliminating all structure. It means designing a structure that supports both autonomy and collaboration.
- Define core collaboration hours: Managers can establish a 3-4 hour window when the entire team is available. Outside that window, employees have full flexibility. This balances autonomy with the reality that some work requires real-time coordination.
- Set clear expectations about communications: Employees often start working in silos, and it becomes very difficult for managers to reach out to them in case of emergencies or last-minute project changes. Defining a fixed response time, for instance, within 3 hours of the email, eliminates the communication issue and ensures that the employees are reachable in case of emergencies.
- Create moments for team connection: If all the team members are working at different times, it becomes difficult to build relationships with other team members. To avoid this, managers must schedule regular all-hands meetings and informal bonding hours to ensure team cohesion even from a remote setup.
What are the mistakes HR teams make while implementing radical flexibility?
HR teams often implement flexibility policies without considering all the operational consequences.
- Treating all roles as equally flexible: Radical flexibility cannot be applied to all the roles. For instance, customer-facing roles require employees to be available on-site during specific hours. Hence, it would be unwise for HR teams to implement radical flexibility equally throughout all departments.
- Flexibility is not the absence of accountability: Employees often misunderstand the flexibility of schedule with flexibility in work output. HR teams, here, must ensure that the flexible work hours do not hamper the final output.
- Untrained managers: Managing an on-site team and managing a team working in a remote setting are two completely different prospects. Managing a remote team involves trusting the employees with the final output, clearly and frequently communicating expectations and targets and ensuring team cohesion.
Conclusion
Radical flexibility isn't just a progressive workplace innovation, but also an overcorrection that solves some problems while creating others. HR teams must understand that while flexibility is valuable, radical flexibility is unsustainable. The organisations that get this right are the ones finding the balance between autonomy and structure.
It’s upto HR teams to build systems that give employees control over their schedules while maintaining the coordination, visibility, and connection that teams need to function. Define core hours, set clear expectations, and train managers to lead in this environment. If radical flexibility is offered without guardrails, teams will struggle to maintain productivity, culture, and cohesion. Balance autonomy with accountability, and HR will build a workplace that's both flexible and functional.
.avif)